Josy Daems vs Danique Havermans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does their second serve performance compare? Danique Havermans wins 38.05% on second serve points, whereas Josy Daems edges ahead slightly with 39.03%, suggesting a marginal advantage for Daems.
• What about return games? Havermans excels with 56.47% against opponents' second serves, outperforming Daems' 49.13%, indicating a strong return game from Havermans.
• In terms of first serve return, Daems has a slight lead with 35.19% compared to Havermans’ 32.31%, showcasing Daems' effectiveness in returning powerful serves.
• Under pressure, Havermans saves 52.50% of breakpoints while Daems' save rate sits at 47.03%, giving Havermans a slight edge in pressure situations.
• Looking at recent match outcomes over the past year, Havermans has a win rate of 61.76%, marginally better than Daems' 60.94%, which could indicate Havermans' consistent performance.
• Both players have their best career-winning percentage on Indoor Hard (I.hard) at 67%, suggesting an even level of comfort on this surface.
• Regarding tournament levels, Daems has a better win rate of 67.50% at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K, surpassing Havermans' 60.71%.
• In terms of opposition, Havermans has faced tougher competitors with an average rank of 218.94, compared to Daems’ 445.38, possibly providing Havermans with more challenging match experience.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Daems shows a higher 77% success rate compared to Havermans’ 67%, suggesting Daems' resilience in crucial moments.

Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Danique Havermans and Josy Daems looks to be a competitive affair, with both players showcasing similar strengths on their preferred surface, Indoor Hard (I.hard). Both players have shown a solid performance in recent months, contributing to a high overall win percentage.

Danique Havermans appears slightly superior in terms of return games and dealing with pressure, as evidenced by a greater percentage of breakpoints saved and a stronger return game. However, Josy Daems demonstrates an edge in service stats, both in second serve points won and deciding set resilience, which could be crucial in tight match scenarios.

Assessing the quality of opponents faced, Havermans has the advantage, having played against stronger ranked opponents, potentially preparing Havermans better for high-stakes matches.

Considering all factors, while Daems holds certain advantages in serving and set-deciding situations, Havermans’ robust performance against higher-tier opponents and greater breakpoint resilience may tilt the balance slightly in Havermans' favor.

Based on these observations, Danique Havermans is slightly favored to win the upcoming encounter.